Unilever
Analysis summary
moralscore.orgUnilever, ce géant anglo-néerlandais né en 1929, règne sur nos placards avec ses 400 marques (Dove, Magnum, Knorr). Ce mastodonte des produits de grande consommation cultive l'art du double discours : engagements climatiques ambitieux et virage vers le plastique recyclé d'un côté, utilisation persistante de phosphates dans ses lessives, ombre du Rana Plaza sur sa chaîne d'approvisionnement, et recentrage fiscal à Londres en 2020 qui a fait grincer des dents. Un cas d'école du capitalisme responsable... à la carte.
Risk level
Several dimensions are poor. Risk of fines, scandal or boycott is elevated. Caution advised.
Detailed risk analysis
Long red bar = high risk on this dimension. Short green bar = solid dimension.
Environmental impact: CO₂ emissions, waste management, water use, climate commitments.
Tax and societal contribution: paying taxes where revenues are generated, philanthropy, local commitments.
Governance: executive pay, board independence, financial transparency, shareholding structure.
Responsible innovation: R&D, beneficial new uses, positive disruption in its market.
Working conditions: fair pay, workplace safety, social dialogue, turnover, wellbeing.
Technology impact: automation, surveillance, digital dependency, ethical AI practices.
Partner fairness: supplier treatment, payment terms, negotiating power, subcontracting practices.
Personal data: collection, storage, customer data use, GDPR compliance, security breaches.
Product/service quality: reliability, user safety, customer satisfaction, recall management.
Price competitiveness: affordability for consumers, pricing practices, cost transparency.
Score computed from the 10 dimensions above (weighted average). Source: CSR reports, court decisions, business press and salary surveys.
Financial data
Source: Yahoo Finance
Updated 18/03/2026, 00:03
- Favourites & Custom lists
- PDF / CSV Export
- Portfolio analysis
- Risk level alerts
- API Access